Live Streaming...
http://www.wildabouttrial.com/trial_videos/michael-dunn-live-stream/
...IMHO, it appears the Defense is trying to confuse the true issue w/irrelevant details (red paint chips on the ground from the Durango; bullet trajectory; the amt of strike-force between two moving objects; window tint; aiming w/laser precision vs. pointing in the general direction...) ...the jury will get caught up in that.
The Prosecution needs to keep them focused on one thing: Dunn killed this teenager because HE was the angry one: he felt disrespected [by these lil "punk-a$$ n***z"]. Nevermind what the kids said to him, the kids didn't shoot Dunn or shoot AT him.
It doesn't matter if Dunn "aimed w/laser precision" or "pointed in the general direction" of the red Durango... he fired 10 times, & NO ONE FIRED BACK.
No one fired back because there was #NoGun.
Dunn said he "saw" a gun, not "I thought I saw a gun..."
However, the Defense wants to confuse the jury by planting the "seed" that because the Durango's windows were tinted (w/in legal range), that maybe Dunn mistakenly "THOUGHT" he saw a gun.
**Here -in lies the rub: regardless of whether he "SAW" a gun or "THOUGHT" he saw a gun.......
(1) who in their right mind turns their back on someone who has a gun pointed @ them?
I would throw my hands up & cry "no harm, no foul - I'm just trying to talk to you about your music...why are you pulling a gun?" Is THAT what Dunn does? NO.
(2) Even if he "THOUGHT" he saw a gun, it appears Dunn "KNEW," - I'll say it, again - DUNN KNEW he had enough time to reach into his vehicle, open the glove compartment, pull out his gun, un-holster it, cock the trigger to chamber a round & fire 10 times, before anyone would be able to FIRE BACK.
IF the kids had a gun, they wouldn't have allowed Dunn to get his, start shooting & NOT fire back. Their "gun" would've already been out & available for use. Dunn wasn't fearful of losing his life: he "TURNED HIS BACK" on the red Durango, reached into his glove compartment; cocked the gun, then fired...
Dunn fired his gun 1 time, 2 times, 3 times, 4 times, 5 times, 6 times, 7 times, 8 times, 9 times, 10 times; & NO ONE FIRED BACK.
Nine out of the ten rounds, Dunn fired, hit the Durango.
With both sides "ALLEGEDLY" having a gun, why wasn't this a re-creation of "the shoot out @ the OK Corral?" The kids were driving off in the red Durango while Dunn was discharging his weapon @ them.
Ten times.
Having seen a gun, did Dunn duck for cover, while firing @ the Durango? Did he seek protection behind the door of his car, hide behind his car, duck behind a garbage can or something? NO.
Why not?
Because he KNEW he didn't need to.
Dunn LIED.
Dunn didn't see a gun, because...
There was NO GUN.
Why didn't Dunn call the police?
He discharged his firearm in public.
WHEN did he tell the police he saw a gun?
Dunn left the scene! THAT's an even bigger issue than not searching for an "alleged" gun.
Had Dunn remained on the scene, he could've told the police about the other parking area the Durango moved to.
The cops would've checked the area (that very night!) for more evidence - in particularly, "a gun."
As in the Zimmerman trial - the killer is the one who initiated the contact. WTF's up w/that?
In watching Dunn in court, he looks so pompous, so proud of himself - as if he's done nothing wrong.
No remorse, no remorse whatsoever.
This trial is a mockery.
http://www.wildabouttrial.com/trial_videos/michael-dunn-live-stream/
...IMHO, it appears the Defense is trying to confuse the true issue w/irrelevant details (red paint chips on the ground from the Durango; bullet trajectory; the amt of strike-force between two moving objects; window tint; aiming w/laser precision vs. pointing in the general direction...) ...the jury will get caught up in that.
The Prosecution needs to keep them focused on one thing: Dunn killed this teenager because HE was the angry one: he felt disrespected [by these lil "punk-a$$ n***z"]. Nevermind what the kids said to him, the kids didn't shoot Dunn or shoot AT him.
It doesn't matter if Dunn "aimed w/laser precision" or "pointed in the general direction" of the red Durango... he fired 10 times, & NO ONE FIRED BACK.
No one fired back because there was #NoGun.
Dunn said he "saw" a gun, not "I thought I saw a gun..."
However, the Defense wants to confuse the jury by planting the "seed" that because the Durango's windows were tinted (w/in legal range), that maybe Dunn mistakenly "THOUGHT" he saw a gun.
**Here -in lies the rub: regardless of whether he "SAW" a gun or "THOUGHT" he saw a gun.......
(1) who in their right mind turns their back on someone who has a gun pointed @ them?
I would throw my hands up & cry "no harm, no foul - I'm just trying to talk to you about your music...why are you pulling a gun?" Is THAT what Dunn does? NO.
(2) Even if he "THOUGHT" he saw a gun, it appears Dunn "KNEW," - I'll say it, again - DUNN KNEW he had enough time to reach into his vehicle, open the glove compartment, pull out his gun, un-holster it, cock the trigger to chamber a round & fire 10 times, before anyone would be able to FIRE BACK.
IF the kids had a gun, they wouldn't have allowed Dunn to get his, start shooting & NOT fire back. Their "gun" would've already been out & available for use. Dunn wasn't fearful of losing his life: he "TURNED HIS BACK" on the red Durango, reached into his glove compartment; cocked the gun, then fired...
Dunn fired his gun 1 time, 2 times, 3 times, 4 times, 5 times, 6 times, 7 times, 8 times, 9 times, 10 times; & NO ONE FIRED BACK.
Nine out of the ten rounds, Dunn fired, hit the Durango.
With both sides "ALLEGEDLY" having a gun, why wasn't this a re-creation of "the shoot out @ the OK Corral?" The kids were driving off in the red Durango while Dunn was discharging his weapon @ them.
Ten times.
Having seen a gun, did Dunn duck for cover, while firing @ the Durango? Did he seek protection behind the door of his car, hide behind his car, duck behind a garbage can or something? NO.
Why not?
Because he KNEW he didn't need to.
Dunn LIED.
Dunn didn't see a gun, because...
There was NO GUN.
Why didn't Dunn call the police?
He discharged his firearm in public.
WHEN did he tell the police he saw a gun?
Dunn left the scene! THAT's an even bigger issue than not searching for an "alleged" gun.
Had Dunn remained on the scene, he could've told the police about the other parking area the Durango moved to.
The cops would've checked the area (that very night!) for more evidence - in particularly, "a gun."
As in the Zimmerman trial - the killer is the one who initiated the contact. WTF's up w/that?
In watching Dunn in court, he looks so pompous, so proud of himself - as if he's done nothing wrong.
No remorse, no remorse whatsoever.
This trial is a mockery.
No comments:
Post a Comment